name, year

Zadkine Fashion Experiment

walkops, extension privaat opdrachtgeverschap, realized 2005, residential

Summa Fashion Biënnale

rap, privaat opdrachtgeverschap, competition, residential

pillerseetal seniors, fieberbrunn, senior housing, 2008, architecture

moerkerke medicare, Moerkerke, health care, 2008, renovation

Millinx 2 – Thuishaven Charlois, Rotterdam, housing, social care

millinx, Rotterdam, housing, healthcare, realized 2004, architecture, reconversion

kleine duizendpoot, rotterdam, kindergarten, 2010

hol(e)iday house

het Buro & de Bovenkamer, housing and office space, in progress

gia, Northern Ireland, tourism, competition, architecture

cascade, Amsterdam, housing, study, 2000, architecture

Beauty&Design Lab

Bandung Block Restructuring, urban renewal

the green corner, Purmerend, daycare center, ongoing, architecture

restructuring post-war housing, housing, 2002, research

maaspavilion, rotterdam, visitor center, 2006, architecture

lex waterfront, Walsall, United Kingdom, housing, conference centre, hotel, 2008, urban planning, competition

kemi waterfront, Kemi, 2005, architecture, urban planning, competition

hoogvliet, Rotterdam, housing, 2005, architecture, research, design

holiday Park, Eiffel, Germany, holidaypark, ongoing, architecture, urban planning

heesterveld dwellandscape, Amsterdam, housing, 2006, architecture, urban planning, competition

filterbuildings, Rotterdam, housing, realized 2008, renovation, study

erasmus apartments, rotterdam, apartment building, 2006, architecture, com.wonen

elemental, chile, housing, competition, architecture, urban planning

dwell landscape Bandung

deep urbanity- the (w)hole block, dordrecht, architecture

de margriet, rotterdam, elementary school, 2004, reconversion

conference domes, Budapest, conference center, 2002, architecture, competition

brewinc culture cluster, Doetinchem, housing, cultural facilities, 2007, urban planning, architecture, tender

bloemhof brede school, rotterdam, Primary school, competition, architecture, 2008

valer church, valer, church, competition, architecture

Social Quality Strategy Gillis Neighborhood

Sandwich Residential Tower, Rotterdam, housing

Louwal low energy town house, Rotterdam, privaat opdrachtgeverschap

Krill featered in Art Calendar

ko black garden, Rotterdam, garden privaat opdrachtgeverschap, realized, 2006

Indonesian Embassy The Hague

Inajur wooden terraced house

House-in-the-Shed 2

house in a shed, Rotterdam, privaat opdrachtgeverschap, 2001, architecture, competition

Goudse Hoofd -shortlisted for the Plan Award 2017, Rotterdam, housing

gardenHouse Meister, Rotterdam, privaat opdrachtgeverschap, realized, architecture

deep urbanity – the (w)hole house, privaat opdrachtgeverschap

Bird watching promenade

moerkerke medicare

mrk slideshow

  • Project: renovation for healthcare
  • Program: medicare for drugaddicts combined with a neighborhood facility
  • Client: Woonstad Rotterdam
  • Design: Harmen van de Wal, Smahan Amrach, Sofia Fernandes, Sonia Sousa, Karzan Kakahama
  • Garden design: Harmen van de Wal, Beverley Walker, Peter van Brandwijk
  • Location: Rotterdam
  • Start design: September 2005
  • Realized: March 2008
  • Consultants: Manja Ellenbroek, LEX-architects
  • Constructor: adviesbureau Baas
  • Contractor: Bam-Volker
  • Building costs: €615.000,00
  • photography: Ximena Davalos, Frank Hanswijk, Margi Geerlings


How to implement a necessary, but impopular program in a run down neighborhood? The double burden of these areas is that not only they form a poor and vulnarable society, but they also attract and generate socially unwanted populations of outfits, such as drug-addicts. In the Southbank of Rotterdam a vast program is being implemented to uplift the neighborhoods. Part of this program is the allocation of small user-centers for the heavily addicted drug-users. It provides them with the elementary hygiene and health care and, more importantly, it is a place to get some rest in their extremely stressfull daily life. These institutes are important for the neighborhood, because they keep the addicts from using on the street and provide them with a reason to behave. But this is an invisible advantage, meanwhile it is an institute nobody wants in his own street. To prevent the user-center to dominate the area and to give the neighborhood a visible advantage, we decided to combine it with a neighborhood-foyer. A facility for the local theatergroup to practice, the community of home-owners to meet, to organise emancipatory meetings for foreign women, or whatever other initiatives the community comes with.
Two houses, part of a larger building block, have been radically altered. A new structure was put over and through the original structure, set to combine two non-matching functions effectively. Therefore it has been subdivided into five slices. On both sides a zone with streight staircases, a transit zone a zone with smaller functional spaces, such as pantries, toilets, staff offices and a zone with larger living areas.

Tags: , , , ,

Show slideshow.